Friday, October 22, 2010

Unaffected Perceptual Thresholds for Biological and Non-Biological Form-from...

 
 

Aan u verzonden door Sander via Google Reader:

 
 

via PLoS ONE Alerts: Neuroscience door Ayse Pinar Saygin et al. op 18-10-10

Background

Perception of biological motion is linked to the action perception system in the human brain, abnormalities within which have been suggested to underlie impairments in social domains observed in autism spectrum conditions (ASC). However, the literature on biological motion perception in ASC is heterogeneous and it is unclear whether deficits are specific to biological motion, or might generalize to form-from-motion perception.

Methodology and Principal Findings

We compared psychophysical thresholds for both biological and non-biological form-from-motion perception in adults with ASC and controls. Participants viewed point-light displays depicting a walking person (Biological Motion), a translating rectangle (Structured Object) or a translating unfamiliar shape (Unstructured Object). The figures were embedded in noise dots that moved similarly and the task was to determine direction of movement. The number of noise dots varied on each trial and perceptual thresholds were estimated adaptively. We found no evidence for an impairment in biological or non-biological object motion perception in individuals with ASC. Perceptual thresholds in the three conditions were almost identical between the ASC and control groups.

Discussion and Conclusions

Impairments in biological motion and non-biological form-from-motion perception are not across the board in ASC, and are only found for some stimuli and tasks. We discuss our results in relation to other findings in the literature, the heterogeneity of which likely relates to the different tasks performed. It appears that individuals with ASC are unaffected in perceptual processing of form-from-motion, but may exhibit impairments in higher order judgments such as emotion processing. It is important to identify more specifically which processes of motion perception are impacted in ASC before a link can be made between perceptual deficits and the higher-level features of the disorder.


 
 

Dingen die u vanaf hier kunt doen:

 
 

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion

Feed: Journal of Vision current issue
Posted on: zaterdag 16 oktober 2010 4:50
Author: Thurman, S. M., Giese, M. A., Grossman, E. D.
Subject: Perceptual and computational analysis of critical features for biological motion

 

Among the most common events in our daily lives is seeing people in action. Scientists have accumulated evidence suggesting humans may have developed specialized mechanisms for recognizing these visual events. In the current experiments, we apply the "bubbles" technique to construct space–time classification movies that reveal the key features human observers use to discriminate biological motion stimuli (point-light and stick figure walkers). We find that observers rely on similar features for both types of stimuli, namely, form information in the upper body and dynamic information in the relative motion of the limbs. To measure the contributions of motion and form analyses in this task, we computed classification movies from the responses of a biologically plausible model that can discriminate biological motion patterns (M. A. Giese & T. Poggio, 2003). The model classification movies reveal similar key features to observers, with the model's motion and form pathways each capturing unique aspects of human performance. In a second experiment, we computed classification movies derived from trials of varying exposure times (67–267 ms) and demonstrate the transition to form-based strategies as motion information becomes less available. Overall, these results highlight the relative contributions of motion and form computations to biological motion perception.


View article...

Suggested by Maarten

Structural processing in biological motion perception

Feed: Journal of Vision current issue
Posted on: zaterdag 16 oktober 2010 4:50
Author: Lu, H.
Subject: Structural processing in biological motion perception

 

To investigate the basis for biological motion perception, structural and motion information were manipulated independently in a dynamic display using a novel stimulus with multiple apertures. Performance was compared in discrimination of global motion (translation and rotation) and biological motion. When structural information in the display was eliminated but motion information was intact, human observers were able to perceive global motion yet were at chance in discriminating walking direction of biological movement. In contrast, when the display provided even noisy and impoverished structural information, walking direction became identifiable. The present findings thus provide direct psychophysical evidence that motion information is insufficient and structural information is necessary for the identification of walking direction in biological movement. These findings imply that computational models must utilize a structural representation of the human body to account for perception of biological movements.


View article...

Suggested by Maarten

Friday, October 1, 2010

Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting

I just saw the title, but it seems relevant for the people doing biological motion.

 
 

Sent to you by Frouke via Google Reader:

 
 


Publication year: 2010
Source: Cognition, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 29 September 2010
Jinfu, Shi , Xuchu, Weng , Sheng, He , Yi, Jiang
The human visual system is extremely sensitive to biological signals around us. In the current study, we demonstrate that biological motion walking direction can induce robust reflexive attentional orienting. Following a brief presentation of a central point-light walker walking towards either the left or right direction, observers' performance was significantly better on a target in the walking direction compared with that in the opposite direction even when participants were explicitly told that walking direction was not predictive of target location. Interestingly, the effect disappeared when the walker was shown upside-down. Moreover, the reflexive attentional orienting could be extended to motions...

 
 

Things you can do from here: